Re: Minimal systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
I was doing some work in identifying a truly minimal package set
required to boot a system, and additionally minimal sets that get you
rpm and yum.  That would then give us a base we could use to determine
dependencies which need to be made optional and to find packages which
need to be split.

With those lists in hand, we could work on rationalizing @core and
@base (because they're not really well-defined) and perhaps collapse
them into one group.

If anyone else is interested in this, please let me know.

yes please. Rationalizing and well-defining @core and @base sounds great to me :) I mean, if there is a rational reason why selinux policy should be explicitly listed in those, then fine, but I haven't heard the reason yet, just the fact.

-dmc

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux