On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 12:49 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:19 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> ext4dev just got a "test_fs" flag which soon must be set in order for > >> the kernel to mount it; this will prevent ext3 from accidentally getting > >> mounted as ext4, and making it hard to go back. (when ext4 goes prime-time, > >> the need for this flag will be removed). > > > > Seems reasonable, only one question -- what happens once the need for > > test_fs goes away if people's ext4 filesystems have the test_fs flag > > set? > > Well, those people who got there via anaconda also had to type > "iamanext4developer" and can use debugfs to unset the flag, if need be. > > Although I think the patch Ted has in store for the kernel will mount a > "test_fs" with "production" code; just not vice versa. > > In any case, I think we should lift the "iamanext4developer" requirement > and the "test_fs" mkfs option at the same time, so that the only people > who wind up with the flag set at least *claimed* to know what they are > doing. Sounds reasonable. Applied the patch. Thanks! Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list