>>>> We can get rid of GConf2 stuff and the XML settings if we patch Dogtail >>>> to not check gconf key for accessibility. This is a simple patch that >>>> will cause one of the Dogtail functions to return always true. >>>> That was discussed long time ago (can't find the link) but there was no >>>> decision. >>> Yeah it'd probably be nice to get rid of the gconf stuff if possible. >>> Perhaps we can go ahead and include these patches, and you can work on >>> getting the simple patch included upstream. >>> > > I'm also confused here. Which patch gets included where? Sorry for being confusing. What I meant to say was: - I'll merge your dogtail patches as-is. - Let's try to get this gconf key accessibility patch merged into gconf. - After that's done, we can deal with removing the stuff from stage2 that we no longer require. Sound good? - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
