On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 12:24 +0100, Jos Vos wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:07:51PM +0100, Alexander Todorov wrote: > > You are right that default, mandatory and optional is hardly automated. > > For that one needs a criteria of some kind (that is probably missing in > > the RPM file). > > As the RPM group tag is just a string, you could probably even include it > there, like with "Group: base(optional)" or "Group: kde-desktop(mandatory)". But doing this misses part of the point, though. By putting the grouping information _outside_ of the package, you can easily change it without having to rebuild the package. And yes, you could change it even if you were doing like this, but I think it would lead to even more confusion than there is today :) Honestly, I'd rather have rpm not require the group tag and just drop specifying it from spec files Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
