On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 09:44:38 -0500, James Olin Oden <james.oden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I might be able to live with this, but again I ask is this desirable > behavior? I can see after thinking through this a bit how in the case > where you were installling over an existing system and partitions were > not being cleared that there would have to be a bit more flexibility > as to the ordering of partitions, but I would have assumed that when > the partitions were cleared, you would end up with same order as was > specified in the kickstart file (implicitly via the order of the part > declerations in the kickstart file)? Is this not a reasonable > assumption? It might make sense to put the smaller partitions or the boot partition first to get around some BIOS restrictions.
