On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 05:06 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > of course, i understand that you can't mess with the hard drive > > partition containing the ISOs, but is there any reason you can't at > > least assign it a mount point for the new system? obviously, i can > > just leave it alone and manually add the entry to /etc/fstab after the > > reboot, but is there any reason it's not allowed now? just curious. > > There's a bug filed about this. The reasoning it for it is fairly > crappy (easier to just disallow *anything* than being more fine-grained > about what gets allowed), so it's just a matter of getting around to > fixing it. you know, i kind of *guessed* that that was the story. :-) rday p.s. i *did* check bugzilla under FC3 for this first, assuming that if it had been filed, it would be under "enhancements". nothing. expanded the search to all filing categories. nothing. after you mentioned it *had* been filed, i went back and opened it up to *all* versions of FC. and there it was, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105722 filed under FC-test2. what's the protocol for how bugs are filed and potentially brought forward? if something is a bug under, say, FC2, and is *still* a bug under FC3, apparently, it won't appear under FC3 in bugzilla unless someone refiles it. this makes it annoyingly hard to find bug reports sometimes.
