On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:39:51PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > I'd kinda like it if installclasses could be completely defined in > > comps.xml. > > Maybe that's crazy talk. > I think so. I think installclasses should be defined elsewhere and comps > should be more tightly constrained to be groups/hierarchy information > only. Also the comps format is going to need to deal with archs in some > more precise way going forward. Okay. I guess I don't particularly care that it's comps.xml per se. Just "not in anaconda proper" -- it seems more like a "distribution config file" than a part of the installer. (I know there's the override thing (thanks!), but why not go all the way?) Hmm. I'm having deja vu.... Yeah, there was a conversation about this last May, and looks like Jeremy had thought about it considerably already. <https://listman.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2004-May/msg00050.html> So yeah, I'm for that. :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
