On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 14:30, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:14:11PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On a related note -- what things would other people like to see going > > in. Features, bugs, changes to functionality... I have some thoughts > > of what direction I want to go in, but a lot of the first pass stuff I > > want to do is more related to clean-ups for easier maintenance than > > anything else. > > I'd kinda like it if installclasses could be completely defined in > comps.xml. > > Maybe that's crazy talk. I think so. I think installclasses should be defined elsewhere and comps should be more tightly constrained to be groups/hierarchy information only. Also the comps format is going to need to deal with archs in some more precise way going forward. If we can make it happen quickly I'd like to work on merging the comps format into the xml repomd format. -sv
