On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:25, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:10 -0700, Taylor, ForrestX wrote: > > I am working on getting my FC2 build released, but I am worried about > > the problem with dual-booting Windows that I have seen. Is there any > > way to get the legacy partitioning info for the installer without any > > manual intervention? Are there any updates for the > > kernel/parted/anaconda that would remedy this problem? > > I still have yet to reproduce the problem. If you have a way to > reliably reproduce it and are willing to test, there's some work going > on in upstream parted to try to make it a non-issue. As it stands right > now, I'm following the discussion and it seems sane, but I can't do much > in the way of testing. If I have someone who can reproduce and who will > test, it's easy enough for me to make an updates.img with an updated > libparted that will get used. Really? I thought that it was an issue for everyone. I haven't had time to even test it with Windows yet--I thought I'd get a fix first and test that. I'll see if I can reliably reproduce the problem and then I'll test libparted. Anaconda grabs the libparted from the installation tree during buildinstall, doesn't it? I can also test a newer parted with buildinstall. > > I've seen > > solutions that use the legacy EDD information to change the heads to > > 255/240, although I haven't been able to determine which disks to > > perform this on. I assume that int13_dev80 is only for device 0x80, > > thus the discussion about disks other than 0x80. > > This is a hack and there are comments in various places about it not > being good enough. It definitely doesn't at all feel robust to me. It certainly is a hack, so I'll try to reproduce the problem and test a newer parted. Thanks, Forrest