On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:07:01PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > seem to work, except that you won't get any glibc at all in the second stage > > image, which will of course manifest itself as "/usr/bin/anaconda: file not > > found" (or something like that), which will be very confusing, as you keep > > saying "what are you talking about? it's _right there_". > There's not a ton that I can really do about that. The error is > basically what you get back from the kernel. I guess that > buildinstall/upd-instroot could error out if "essential" packages are > missing. Accepting patches :) Sorry, I didn't mean to complain about what the kernel does when libraries are missing. :) What I mean to complain about :) is: should there be added an ugly hack to make it know that if it can't find i386, it should use i686? (Like it does for the kernel package already?) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
