Re: RHEL 3 genhdlist gotcha

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes it does explain it :-)  Turns out providing pkgorder isn't 
optional, as genhdlist would have you believe:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122373


Joshua



On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 05:25:08PM +0200, Alain TAUCH wrote:

> well, this explains joshua's problems regarding kickstart and AMD64 packages.
> 
> I got 2 questions here:
>   - why do you need a specific pkgorder file ? 
>     (since arch is not specified in there)
>   - why did you choose to keep arch-specific hdlists, couldn't
>     this be patched ? since "normal" installations do behave
>     correctly this should not be so difficult ... is it ?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alain 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

-- 
Joshua Jensen <jjensen@xxxxxxxxx>
Work:  919 392 1488  Mobile: 919 454 9679  Fax: 919 392 7377
Pager: 866 264 2691  Epage: jjensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IBM Linux Architect - RHCE, RHCT, etc
"If God didn't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat?"



[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux