Yes it does explain it :-) Turns out providing pkgorder isn't optional, as genhdlist would have you believe: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122373 Joshua On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 05:25:08PM +0200, Alain TAUCH wrote: > well, this explains joshua's problems regarding kickstart and AMD64 packages. > > I got 2 questions here: > - why do you need a specific pkgorder file ? > (since arch is not specified in there) > - why did you choose to keep arch-specific hdlists, couldn't > this be patched ? since "normal" installations do behave > correctly this should not be so difficult ... is it ? > > > -- > Alain > > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list -- Joshua Jensen <jjensen@xxxxxxxxx> Work: 919 392 1488 Mobile: 919 454 9679 Fax: 919 392 7377 Pager: 866 264 2691 Epage: jjensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx IBM Linux Architect - RHCE, RHCT, etc "If God didn't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat?"