RE: Kickstart-tools making of build_ks.conf file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: RE: Kickstart-tools making of build_ks.conf file
From: "Alexander Rau \(private\)" <alexander_rau@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:54:01 -0400
Cc: "'Chan, Dominic'" <DWC@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <1060171160.14289.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In the package definition do I need to specify the 'rpm' name (i.e.
acl-2.2.3-1.i386.rpm) or is the short form acceptable (i.e. acl)?

Thanks


Alexander Rau, Dipl.-Betriebswirt, A+, MCP, MCSA, MCSE

Customer and Agent Relations & IT Manager

Schleese Saddlery Service Ltd

Phone: 1-800-225-2242 ext. 29

Fax:     1-905-898-8399

Prev by Date: Re: does have anaconda abilities to install arch dependant packages
Next by Date: Run once with autologon
Previous by thread: Re: Kickstart-tools making of build_ks.conf file
Next by thread: Re: Kickstart-tools making of build_ks.conf file
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kickstart] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux