I've got an usb card already. I wanted an internal card because that is easier, I don't have to edit the alsa files all the time, and reboot and so. Ok, there is the realtek card on the motherboard, but you can't record or anything with that. The only cards I can see on the market are asus and creative. /Kristoffer 2016-11-12 12:42 GMT+01:00, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > I'm being blasted by adverts. I think the website is click bait. ;-) Open > source people don't like adverts. I'd use the ALSA list. > > Regarding Pulse Audio, I run opensuse where you can painfully turn it off > and on. I say painful because I really never had the selection box work > without doing a boot. Generally things work better without Pulse Audio. It > was a buggy program initially but eventually was OK. > > I do signal processing with sound cards so I don't need the best. In fact, I > used those Diamond cards to get an old school 8 bit audio. > > I've had good luck getting functionality out of USB cards. For whatever > reason, those C-Media based cards work well under Linux. > > I've often wondered why there never was a kick starter for a dedicated Linux > sound card. Give the programmers whatever they want. > Original Message > From: Kristoffer Gustafsson > Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 3:10 AM > To: lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: chris hermansen; alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: how much does pulseaudio use alsa > > Hi. > I read this Before buying > http://www.linux-hardware-guide.com/2014-08-26-creative-sound-blaster-audigy-rx-sb1550-7-1-sound-sound-card-pcie > /Kristoffer > > 2016-11-12 9:31 GMT+01:00, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> With linux, use approved cards. It isn't like the manufacturers embrace >> Linux. The programmers/maintainers work with what they are given. >> http://alsa.opensrc.org/Sound_cards >> >> I don't have the system running at the moment, but I have used multiple >> Diamond multimedia PCI sound cards for a sigint project. >> From: chris hermansen >> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 9:16 PM >> To: Kristoffer Gustafsson >> Cc: alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: how much does pulseaudio use alsa >> >> Kristoffer and list, >> >> On Nov 11, 2016 01:19, "Kristoffer Gustafsson" <kg.kristoffer@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi. >>> Since I had no luck with alsa on the audigy 2rx I decided to try out >>> gnome. >>> no sound using the graphical interface as well. >>> so my question is does pulse use alsa? >>> it would be nice to know >>> I'm thinking on buying one more soundcard. >>> with do you Think I shall get that is better than this? >> >> From the Arch Linux wiki (as an example) >> >> "PulseAudio serves as a proxy to sound applications using existing kernel >> sound components like ALSA or OSS. Since ALSA is included in Arch Linux >> by >> default, the most common deployment scenarios include PulseAudio with >> ALSA. >> >>> I'm thinking of using the Soundblaster in windows, and the better card >>> in Linux if I find one. >> >> Kristoffer, we don't know what would be "better" for you. >> >> Must your DAC be portable? USB or something else (internal maybe)? High >> sample rates? Record or just playback? Record multichannel? Etc. >> >> Chris Hermansen >> >> >> > > > -- > Kristoffer Gustafsson > Salängsgatan 7a > tel:033-12 60 93 > mobil: 0730-500934 > -- Kristoffer Gustafsson Salängsgatan 7a tel:033-12 60 93 mobil: 0730-500934 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
