On 22/01/13 16:15, User wrote: >> You should look in /proc/asound instead: aplay requires quite a lot of >> > things to be working, /proc/asound will exist even when only ALSA is >> > present. > Please don't get me wrong here. > I AM **NOT** using the DEPRECATED OSS drivers. (period) > > I AM USING THE ALSA OSS LAYER - ONLY ALSA. > and they all load and run properly. just fine. > Sequencer, clock, etc... Please don't shout at me. I'm suggesting that instead of aplay -l that you look in /proc/asound instead: aplay requires a lot of things to be working before it reports anything at all. /proc/asound will be there even if nothing works and will certainly include useful information even when aplay doesn't do anything useful. > As today seems that a lot of folks are biased towards the UDEV thing.... > I tried... It's not bias, it's a question of using what is known to work. Note that among other things, udev handles the cases where the major and minor numbers for a device aren't fixed. You may or may not be falling foul of this. jch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
