On 01.08.2012 13:25, Sid Boyce wrote: > The way I read threads Daniel, > I discover a new problem, I search the archives and it's all there, the > original and the follow-ups - nothing lost. > > When I'm following a topic in a live list I have already taken in all > the previous information and if there is bottom posting I fast scroll > past all the previous stuff to read the latest update only - nothing > lost either. > > If there is top posting the information update I need is immediately in > view. For me it's more efficient when I am on several lists with > hundreds of emails to wade through each and every day. It's often not even clear _what_ you refer to if don't write it _next_to_what_you_refer_to_. Threads around here are complex and cover multiple single details, and just writing a summed-up answer to all of it leaves it to the other person to find out how to put them in context (read up what the question actually was, guess around what might refer to what etc). Especially on mailing lists where many people hang out to help others on a (in my case mostly) volounteer base, it is even offending to cause that extra burden of work, really. You're free to do that as you wish of course, but I found my own way of dealing with this issue: I usually ignore people who won't stick to widely adopted rules. They simply waste my time. Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
