On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 22:34:40 -0500 James Shatto <wwwshadow7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Please reread my message in this thread on 'sox' - it contains the complete > > command line I've used. > > So apples to oranges? since your sox only does 4 seconds (trim 1 5) > and your arecord does 6 seconds -d 6. Statistically that's 50% more > opportunity for failure in arecord. > > ----- > > Did omitting -D help? did adding -t wav help, so it doesn't have to > assume stuff (or not) based only on file extension? > > milliseconds are what? 1/1000 of a second. So 855507586.521 is about > 85,550 seconds. Or roughly 1,426 minutes or roughly 23 hours and 46 > minutes. Kind of odd for a 6 second capture don't you think? Or is > the result and the example unrelated? > > - James > > No, it is the same kind of fruit. When I run 'arecord', I run it sometimes with VU meter, so I see when relative to the stream overruns happen. They can happen anywhere - in the beginning, in the middle, closer to the end. And I tried 'sox' with different lengths, including 6 seconds - no overruns. Regards, Sergei. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
