Alexander Carôt wrote: > 3.) Rather than using a double buffer for the playout wouldn't it be > possible to choose only one physical playout buffer and parse the > captured data in right at the interrupt. It's unlikely that any code could be fast enough to write the entire buffer before the hardware starts reading from the buffer; in fact, the hardware is likely to read the first sample from the buffer at the same time it is triggering the interrupt for the previous period. To reduce output latency, just reduce the output buffer size. For example, you could use a buffer with 128 samples (with 2 64-sample periods). HTH Clemens ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
