On 27-04-08 12:55, Sergei Steshenko wrote: > On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:21:23 +0200 Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> (the card = the M-Audio Revolution. No control is the expected >> situation) > > ??? > > For me it's the opposite - if a card is capable of having different > sample rates, the expected situation is to be able to change the rate > from mixer. Makes no sense. Setting the sampling rate has no meaning outside of the action of playing or recording. It's you who decides the sampling rate, but by the rate of whatever you throw at the card for playback, or by whatever rate you specify for a recording. The card adepts to the data (for playback that is), not the other way around. Note that mixing is not (historically) an expected feauture either and at least when not supported directly in hardware, an unwanted feature these days by most people that care. Rene. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
