Hello,
thanks for your response.
stan wrote:
> I think you are asking if the quality of the sound will be the same if
> routed to the back channels of the card.
Yes, I should formulate my questions better next time.
> I just looked at
> the .asoundrc at the link and it looks to me like the output will be
> the same as long as you use this version that takes front
> channels and routes them to the back channels at full volume.
> # upmixing:
> pcm.ch51dup {
> type route
> slave.pcm dmix6
> slave.channels 6
> ttable.0.0 1
> ttable.1.1 1
> ttable.0.2 1 <--- routing to rear
> ttable.1.3 1 <--- at full volume
> ttable.0.4 0.5
> ttable.1.4 0.5
> ttable.0.5 0.5
> ttable.1.5 0.5
> }
>
> It does some unnecessary mixing for your case, but you won't hear the
> difference, it will only make the cpu work a little harder.
>
> There is one caveat: That the plugins don't alter the quality of the
> sound as it passes through them.
I'm not fully understand this sentence. Why this is a caveat ?
> If you feel like experimenting you could change the ch51dup
> to ch20dup as follows:
> # upmixing:
> pcm.ch20dup {
> type route
> slave.pcm dmix6
> slave.channels 6
> ttable.0.2 1
> ttable.1.3 1
> }
>
> Beyond that you could change the dmix6 to use only 4 channels, 0, 1, 2,
> 3.
I'll try this. Can I also just skip dmix6 and route the sound directly to
hardware ?
--
Best Regards,
Vladimir
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
