Re: Help/advice on RME cards and Linux ALSA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ronan,

first, RME Firewire devices are not supported (yet) AFAIK.

On 16/01/07, ronan mcallister <bass.woofer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm writing to ask about the RME cards relatively to Linux (I'm using
> Suse 10.1) -- which RME cards are the most fully-featured to work with
> ALSA in the various product lines?  Which cards within those most
> actively "supported" by the driver developers are the most robust and
> the best cost/feature wise?  Which have the most flexibilty?

The flexibility part depends on your needs.  I use a bunch of
Multifaces (>15) and Digifaces (>8) on a number of machines (>24), as
well as three MADI systems and one HDSP9652. The MADI systems have the
highest number of I/O channels. The HDSP 9652 is like a built-in
Digiface. If you need that many channels, you would have to get a
Digiface and some ADI-8 AD/DAs. ADI-8 are high quality units that
convert ADAT to analog and vice versa, at a pretty high price.
I also tried using Alesis units that also do analog to ADAT
conversion, but all odd channels have a 1.3 sample latency with
respect to the even channels, so they're unusable to me.

> The 9632 can handle supposedly 6 I/O simultaneously.
> Is my assumption I'd need one output card for use to implement a 2X6
> analog I/O correct?

You need one input channel per speaker and apparently three outputs.
While I personally think that that is overkill (why not make a good
analog crossover), that's what you'd have to do. So for a 5.1 system
you'd need 16 channels (3x5 for 5 surround channels plus 1 for the
sub).

> Which of the RME cards are most actively used/supported?

Support is good for all PCI-based cards.  Keep your mitts off the
Firewire units.

> Are there any other sound cards with similar characteristics that
> might be a better choice?

I don't know of any that are that good. For that  reason I (well, my
company) uses RME.

> I can buy dedicated prosound or
> home hifi equipment (loudspeaker management system) to do the same for
> less money -- yet I'd rather implement in something like BruteFIR and
> Linux if I can avoid commercial equipment.

Not to mention the flexibility you'll get.  But you'll pay dearly for it.

> Oh and one problem with the RME card is if I need onboard I/O cards,
> it will take up more PCI slots than I have (I only have one spare PCE
> card).  I'd have to find a PCI extender etc.  I wonder if I should
> look at a fully outboard firewire device?

RME HDSP 9652 takes one PCI slot and one additional slot cover without
occupying the actual slot. Plus external AD/DAs.

HTH, RoMan

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux