On Do, 2007-01-04 at 12:10 +0200, Sergei Steshenko wrote: > OK, now that we see that the unmodified version segfaults please > apply just the fprintfs I suggested in order to see what is happening > to alignment and FFTW plans. > > I mean, the proposed > > fprintf(stderr, "just after plan calculation: (*plugin_data).plan_rc$suffix=%08lx at line number %d\\n", (unsigned)(*plugin_data).plan_rc$suffix, __LINE__); > > fprintf(stderr, "just before using the plan: plan_rc$suffix=%08lx at line number %d\\n", (unsigned)plan_rc$suffix, __LINE__); > > lines; by the way, it I think it would be cleaner to use '(unsigned long)' > rather than the "(unsigned)" type casting - IIRC the compiler issues > warnings in the latter case, but does the right thing since on x86 the > types are the same. > > > Also, though it shouldn't matter, please use the 0 control values > I've used. The point is that db table lookup mechanism may be broken > (hard to believe, but it is possible), so let's not introduce new > factors for a time being. > Well, I used the 0 control values with your completely unmodified version and it didn't segfault. Shall I still add the fprintfs? > Thanks, > Sergei. Best regards, Sebastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
