On 05/31/2017 01:44 AM, William Brown
wrote:
the changes will be logged independent if they are replicated or not, so trimming is the only way to limit the size.On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 15:42 +0300, Alparslan Ozturk wrote:this is my person object and it has lastlogintime (the operational attribute) so if many user bind the lastlogintime information updated so replication is started. now I am changed agreement exclude lastlogintime many replication is not accured. so changelogdb size slowly incrace. but still incrace the size.I don't think you can use fractionalReplication like this. Because you end up commiting a change on either A or B master that can't be resolved by the other, so the cl will grow forever. Allow the replication of the attr :) if you mean that trimming doesn't happen if the change is not rpelicated, this should be handled by the regular update of the "keep alive" entry, which will be replicated and update the consumer ruv, so that trimming can procede
-- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander |
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx