Re: 1.2.11.30 ETA?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rich,

if you mean 3 months for 1.2.11.30, then i might consider building this for my test environment - which is somewhat active.  If you think this would be helpful.

/mrg

On Jul 7, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 07/03/2014 05:13 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:10:01 -0600
>> Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 07/03/2014 03:58 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
>>>> We're actually on CentOS 6. We'd be happy to use the standard distro
>>>> version, but we're seeing a lot of crashes (about half a dozen or so a day;
>>>> we've got Puppet set up to check every five minutes and restart if it's
>>>> down). We're not absolutely sure that our problems are caused by the bugs
>>>> fixed in 1.2.11.30, but we want to try rolling out the fixes as soon as
>>>> possible to see if it alleviates the problems.
>>> Would you be willing to build from source?
>> We're willing to consider it, though we'd rather avoid it.
>>>>>> I'm specifically asking because we have been seeing a lot of crashes on
>>>>>> our LDAP system. The coredumps we sent through resulted in some tickets
>>>>>> that have been fixed as part of 1.2.11.30, so we're hoping that the
>>>>>> upgrade would make our systems more stable.
>>>>> Which tickets are these?
>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47696 is the ticket I reported, but
>>>> nhosoi created https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47750 as a related
>>>> ticket, and https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47764 seems to be affecting
>>>> us as well.
>>> Looks like these are due for RHEL 6.6 . . .
>> Hmm, OK, looks like some of them will be in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-34.el6, and
>> we're on 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-33.el6_5, so I'm guessing that it's not far off?
> 
> Would you consider "approximately 3 months, give or take" to be far off?  If so, you might want to investigate building your own packages.
> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
> 
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux