I would love to patch it, but like I tried to indicate it would be more like rewriting.
In my case, choosing another frontend was more viable.
I personally do not know who is using dsgw and for what, I know it has more capabilities than just resetting a user password.
I would love to contribute, but if nobody is using the functionality, it would be a bit of a wate of time from my point of view.
Next time I need a change, I will try to contribute.
I personally do not know who is using dsgw and for what, I know it has more capabilities than just resetting a user password.
I would love to contribute, but if nobody is using the functionality, it would be a bit of a wate of time from my point of view.
Next time I need a change, I will try to contribute.
I saw the last patch was 11 months ago: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/dsgw.git/ ?
Since your name is on most versions, can you say something about usage and what parts users would like to see improved?
Thank you!
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/07/2014 06:54 AM, Dave Page wrote:Yes.
Hi
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Vincent Gerris <vgerris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you mean that the layout is messed up, you are right.
It is terrible and looks different on about any browser.
I filed a bug for the ubuntu package where I found it too:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/389-dsgw/+bug/1286035
There has been no reaction yet, it actually should have been reported
upstream too I suppose.
Patches are welcome.
Oh, that's disappointing.
Given the (un)usability of the interface, I ended up completely using a
different front-end, because we just wanted a self service portal for users.
I think dsgw has not been touched for some time, would be usefull if it was
using modern code and a good ui to include at least a decent self service
webportal by default.
This is what I ended up using instead :Thanks. We can use our existing UI for password changes, but I was
http://ltb-project.org/wiki/documentation/self-service-password
hoping for something I could let our HR people use to manage user info
with - one of the reasons why 389 seemed like a good choice.
--389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
