Hi, Please remove me from this list. Thank you, David On 23 Apr 2014, at 15:14, Elizabeth Jones <bajones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> You mentioned 2 servers ldap1 and ldap2. Are they both masters? You put >> "local consumer" to ldap2. Does that mean ldap2 is a read only replica? > > We have two data centers and each data center has an ldap1 and ldap2. All > 4 are masters, but we only ever send updates to DCA-ldap1. That then > pushes to DCA-ldap2 and to DCB-ldap1. DCB-ldap1 pushes to DCB-ldap2, so > the ldap2's are really functioning as consumers all the time. > >> >> It looks to me ldap1 got broken and ldap2 is still healthy. You may >> want to make ldap1 in sync with ldap2 and start from there. If ldap2 is >> a master, you could re-initialize ldap1 from ldap2. >> >> If ldap2 is a read only replica, you could export the contents with >> db2ldif -r -n <your_backend> command line utility on ldap2 and import >> the exported ldif file to ldap1. >> >> Or if you don't mind losing the replication information such as >> tombstones and state info, you could export the contents without "-r" by >> db2ldif on ldap2 and import the ldif file to ldap1, then re-initialize >> ldap2 on ldap1. >> >> Hope you could choose one of the 3 ways and it fixes the problem. > > I will give this a shot. When we tried to initialize these last week the > initialization emptied out the receiving ldap and I believe that was a bug > that is fixed in 1.3. I recovered by using a backup but I don't want to > try initializing again until we can upgrade to 1.3. Can I still do the > ldif on ldap2, since it is actually a master rather than a read only > replica? > > Thanks, > EJ > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
