> > You mentioned 2 servers ldap1 and ldap2. Are they both masters? You put > "local consumer" to ldap2. Does that mean ldap2 is a read only replica? We have two data centers and each data center has an ldap1 and ldap2. All 4 are masters, but we only ever send updates to DCA-ldap1. That then pushes to DCA-ldap2 and to DCB-ldap1. DCB-ldap1 pushes to DCB-ldap2, so the ldap2's are really functioning as consumers all the time. > > It looks to me ldap1 got broken and ldap2 is still healthy. You may > want to make ldap1 in sync with ldap2 and start from there. If ldap2 is > a master, you could re-initialize ldap1 from ldap2. > > If ldap2 is a read only replica, you could export the contents with > db2ldif -r -n <your_backend> command line utility on ldap2 and import > the exported ldif file to ldap1. > > Or if you don't mind losing the replication information such as > tombstones and state info, you could export the contents without "-r" by > db2ldif on ldap2 and import the ldif file to ldap1, then re-initialize > ldap2 on ldap1. > > Hope you could choose one of the 3 ways and it fixes the problem. I will give this a shot. When we tried to initialize these last week the initialization emptied out the receiving ldap and I believe that was a bug that is fixed in 1.3. I recovered by using a backup but I don't want to try initializing again until we can upgrade to 1.3. Can I still do the ldif on ldap2, since it is actually a master rather than a read only replica? Thanks, EJ -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
