I'm not really 100% sure why we didn't put RHEL 6.4 on. I think it had to do with some RAID hard drive enclosure driver issues and Dell recommended 6.3. Anyhow, we are running 1.2.1 currently and I suppose we would want to run the latest. We were looking at some of the docs but hadn't really found anything "step by step" so I thought I'd ask.
Thanks!
Harry Devine
Common ARTS Software Development
AJM-245
(609)485-4218
Harry.Devine@xxxxxxx
| From: | Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
| To: | "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." <389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Cc: | Harry Devine/ACT/FAA@FAA |
| Date: | 08/13/2013 03:30 PM |
| Subject: | Re: Question about installing on new servers |
On 08/13/2013 01:09 PM, harry.devine@xxxxxxx wrote:
We have 2 new servers that we are bringing into our suite, and we'd like them to eventually take over the current 389-ds role. We currently have 2 servers that are running 1.2.1 on CentOS 5.7 64-bit, and the 2 new servers are being installed with RHEL 6.3 64-bit. What we'd ultimately like to see/have happen is:
install 389-ds on the new servers
set up replication to replicate the data from the 2 old servers to the 2 new servers
point the underlying LDAP operations to the 2 new servers
take the 2 old servers out of the mix
Does anyone have any ideas or thoughts on if this is a good plan? And the best way to accomplish what we'd like to do?
Yes, that should work.
Why not RHEL 6.4?
What version of 389-ds-base are you planning to use?
Thanks,
Harry Devine
Common ARTS Software Development
AJM-245
(609)485-4218
Harry.Devine@xxxxxxx
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
