Hello Paul,
Thank you for your answer. My intention is to use Samba 3 as, as far as
I am aware, use of Samba 4 in productioon environments is discouraged at
this point. Regarding FreeIpa, yes, I am inclined to add it to my setup,
but further on, not in the short term. My objective now is to have a
server with 389 and Samba 3 up and running the soonest. My problems come
from the use of Centos 6, instead of Centos 5, as there are some
differences that affect the set up procedure which are not well
documented and I see there is not much experience yet on the Web. And,
of course, my lack of previous experience with 389...
Kind regards,
Alberto Suarez.
Paul Robert Marino wrote:
For clarity are you planing to use samba 3 or 4?
There is a huge difference between the two mainly samba 4 has its own
kerberos 5 server (its a embedded fork of Heimdal).
This muddies the water a bit when talking about samba 4 because while
on pure technical merits I think Heimdal Kerberos 5 is superior
implementation when compared to MIT Kerberos 5, RedHat and Most other
Distributions have standardized on MIT Kerberos 5. Note you can get
MIT Kerberos to work with Samba 4 but it breaks some of the
compatibility with samba and the windows Kerberos Client.
As a result the answer is very different depending on which one you
plan to use and if you plan to use FreeIPA or not.
2012/5/3 Alberto Suárez<asuapaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hello:
I think I have succeded in setting up 389ds on Centos 6.2. Now I would like
to integrate samba with 389. Is there any documentation available that
explains how to do it?
Thank you!
Alberto Suárez.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
