For clarity are you planing to use samba 3 or 4? There is a huge difference between the two mainly samba 4 has its own kerberos 5 server (its a embedded fork of Heimdal). This muddies the water a bit when talking about samba 4 because while on pure technical merits I think Heimdal Kerberos 5 is superior implementation when compared to MIT Kerberos 5, RedHat and Most other Distributions have standardized on MIT Kerberos 5. Note you can get MIT Kerberos to work with Samba 4 but it breaks some of the compatibility with samba and the windows Kerberos Client. As a result the answer is very different depending on which one you plan to use and if you plan to use FreeIPA or not. 2012/5/3 Alberto Suárez <asuapaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hello: > > I think I have succeded in setting up 389ds on Centos 6.2. Now I would like > to integrate samba with 389. Is there any documentation available that > explains how to do it? > > Thank you! > > Alberto Suárez. > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
