Re: [389-users] SSL initialization Failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/07/2012 06:34 AM, Luigi Santangelo wrote:

Hi guru,
i have a problem with enabling SSL in my Fedora Directory Server. I already searched with google and I have found other people that have same problem but, following the instructions, I cannot resolve my problem (maybe my problem has a different source).
I start by saing that in the past I have enabled SSL on FDS 1.2.5 succesfully, but with FDS 1.2.12 rc2 I cannot.

I'm assuming you mean 1.2.10.rc2 - Don't use rc2 - use 1.2.10.3 which is in updates-testing

On my Fedora 16, with kernel 3.2.7-1, I installed FDS 1.2.12rc2. Then, I created a request for the Directory Server (using Manage Certificates). During this operation, I inserted the FQDN in Server Name field and I completed other field (Organization, State, etc). Then I exported the request and, using a my self-signed CA, I created a cert for the server. I imported server and CA certs succesfully. In the Certification Path tab of server cert, I can see the correct chain (server and ca certs). But when I enable SSL for my server (with Encryption tab) and I restart my server, it cannot start correctly and give me this error:

SSL alert: Security Initialization: Unable to authenticate (Netscape Portable Runtime error -8192 - An I/O error occurred during security authorization.)
ERROR: SSL Initialization Failed.

But if I create a key and cert with openssl for my server (then not creating the request and sign it, but creating the cert directly with openssl), I export the cert in p12 format and I import it with certutil utility, it works fine: I can enable SSL and I can restart my server without any problem.

Then, I thing that I wrong to insert the information during generation request. Can you help me?

You should also use 389-admin-1.1.27 from updates-testing - there was a similar bug fixed in 389-admin

Another question (mere curiosity): why RedHat Directory Server and Fedora Directory Server have different version number? Its doesn't offer the same features? Thanks

389 (formerly Fedora Directory Server) is the upstream open source project which changes frequently and has new features as soon as they are developed.  Red Hat Directory Server is the downstream product which does not change as frequently, and only gets new features once they are tested, documented, and support ready.




--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux