On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Penedo <penedo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
sure, I can add this is the FAQ. I am surprised that 389 has such issues in rhel6, I thought it was only Redhat Directory Server (the paid supported version of 389) that would have extras and optional features.
On 2 August 2011 09:17, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Thanks for the summary. This should probably be copied into the
> So, to summarize, if you want the full 389 ds/admin/console on EL6:
> 1) you must use EL 6.1 or later
> 2) you must use 389-ds-base from the fedorapeople.org repo
> 3) you must use EPEL6 for the other packages
Wiki/FAQ section, IMHO.
Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean
that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to
stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP solutions? Or will the people in
this forum keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version?
389's multi-master replication and general stability are a killer
feature from my perspective.
sure, I can add this is the FAQ. I am surprised that 389 has such issues in rhel6, I thought it was only Redhat Directory Server (the paid supported version of 389) that would have extras and optional features.
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
