Cache tuning errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi - I had a read of the Redhat documentation on cache sizes and tuning 
and tried tweaking one of my servers as it was setup with the default.  
The server is a Fedora 10 box with 4GB of RAM so I decided to setup the 
cache as:

nsslapd-cachememsize = 3145728000 (3GB)
nsslapd-dbcachesize   = 3670016000 (3.5GB)

But when I restart I get the message:
[01/Apr/2010:13:56:30 +0100] - WARNING -- Possible CONFIGURATION ERROR 
-- cachesize (2072199168) may be configured to use more than the 
available physical memory.
[01/Apr/2010:13:56:30 +0100] - WARNING---Likely CONFIGURATION 
ERROR---dbcachesize is configured to use more than the available 
physical memory, decreased to the largest available size (2072199168 bytes).
[01/Apr/2010:13:56:30 +0100] - I'm resizing my cache now...cache was 
2072203264 and is now 2072199168

Is there a limit of 2GB on the cache sizes?  The server has 4GB memory..

I then put the settings down lower to:
nsslapd-cachememsize = 1153433600 (1.1 GB)
nsslapd-dbcachesize   = 1677721600 (1.6 GB)

I then hit it with some big queries to load up the cache and now I get:
[01/Apr/2010:14:34:15 +0100] - libdb: txn_checkpoint: failed to flush 
the buffer cache: Cannot allocate memory
[01/Apr/2010:14:34:15 +0100] - Serious Error---Failed to checkpoint 
database, err=12 (Cannot allocate memory)
[01/Apr/2010:14:34:15 +0100] - libdb: malloc: 3145764: Cannot allocate 
memory
[01/Apr/2010:14:34:15 +0100] - libdb: txn_checkpoint: failed to flush 
the buffer cache: Cannot allocate memory
[01/Apr/2010:14:34:15 +0100] memory allocator - calloc of 8194 elems of 
4 bytes failed; OS error 12 (Cannot allocate memory)
The server has probably allocated all available virtual memory.

When that happened top was reporting the slapd process only using %40 
memory and there is nothing else running on this server.

I was trying to do some tuning as these servers are worked quite hard 
and the "Entry Cache hits" was showing as 0 - I would of expected some 
hits even with a smallish cache?

Thanks.

Jim.








[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux