Hi, You may take a look at : http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/memoryusage.html Some nice explications of cache structures and design can also be found on the sun (soon oracle) site : http://docs.sun.com/source/817-5220/caching.html 2010/4/1 Alan Orli? Bel?ak <alan.orlic at zd-lj.si> > One more question, any recommendations about that? How big should be > cache, what to do for better performance, etc? > > Bye, Alan > > On 1.4.2010 8:59, Alan Orli? Bel?ak wrote: > > Nevermind, found the problem, nsslapd-cachememsize, changed the size of > > cache and the process immediately start to work normaly. > > > > Bye, Alan > > > > On 1.4.2010 8:05, Alan Orli? Bel?ak wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> we're using Fedora 1.2.5 with samba 3.5.1 and in the last time on the > >> server we're getting unusual activity of ns-slapd process - every few > >> seconds it goes from sleep to 100% of cpu time and stays there for a > >> few seconds. I have no idea why, our userroot database is only 30 MB > >> (1500 users, 1000 computers), we're using LDAP just for that. The only > >> thing I changed in the last time is that I added some informations > >> like address, office, position etc. Those fields aren't indexed, can > >> this be a problem? > >> > >> Bye, Alan > >> > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20100401/5c33e807/attachment.html
