OK; opened: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571677 2010/3/9 Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> > Juan Asensio S?nchez wrote: > > One note, we have servers with version 1.1.3 and servers that have > > been upgraded to version 1.2.5. Only the servers that have been > > upgraded to 1.2.5 are showing the busy replica error, not those with > > version 1.1.3. Hope this could help. > Please file a bug. Does this happen every time you attempt to delete a > replication conflict entry? Does it happen with any other sort of > entry? This began happening with 1.2.5? > > > > Regards. > > > > > > El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:50, Juan Asensio S?nchez <okelet at gmail.com > > <mailto:okelet at gmail.com>> escribi?: > > > > These are the messages when enabling replication logs: > > > > [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 > > op=11 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Replica in use > > locking_purl=conn=207283 id=3 > > [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 > > op=11 replica="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Unable to acquire > > replica: error: replica busy locked by conn=207283 id=3 for > > incremental update > > [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 > > op=11 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": > > StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest: response=1 rc=0 > > [08/Mar/2010:16:02:54 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 > > op=13 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Begin incremental protocol > > > > These are all the messages in the access.log referring the > > connection conn=207283 > > > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 fd=607 slot=607 SSL > > connection from XXXXXX to XXXXXX > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 SSL 256-bit AES > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 BIND > > dn="cn=Replication Manager,cn=config" method=128 version=3 > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 > > nentries=0 etime=0 dn="cn=replication manager,cn=config" > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0 > > filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension" > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 > > nentries=1 etime=0 > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 SRCH base="" scope=0 > > filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension" > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101 > > nentries=1 etime=0 > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 EXT > > oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.3" name="Netscape Replication Start > > Session" > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=120 > > nentries=0 etime=0 > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL > > > dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e4060000+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX" > > > > And no more... As you can see, the replica is busy since 8:16 (now > > is 16:51, in Spain). I am locked :S. > > > > > > El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:44, Juan Asensio S?nchez > > <okelet at gmail.com <mailto:okelet at gmail.com>> escribi?: > > > > At first sight, there are no messages neither in access or > > error logs, in supplier or consumers. Last modification > > operation in the busy replica/database is: > > > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL > > > dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e4060000+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX,dc=XXX" > > > > which does not get any RESULT operation. I have just enabled > > replication logs in the consumer to see any messages. As soon > > i get them, i will post. > > > > Regards. > > > > > > 2010/3/8 Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> > > > > Juan Asensio S?nchez wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > I have posted this on the chat, but i am not sure if it > > is wirking > > > fine in my computer. I am using 389ds 1.2.5, and i have > > found some > > > replication conflicts (nsds5replicaconflict=*). I have > > deleted them > > > manually, and now the databases in the other servers are > > busy all the > > > time, no matter if i restart the service in the source > > or target > > > servers (i must kill the target servers as they never > > stop), when the > > > replication agreement is launched again from the source > > server, the > > > replica is busy all the time. the last operation in the > > access log of > > > the replicated servers is the deletion of the object in > > conflict, > > > which never gets a result. > > Any thing in the errors log of the suppliers or the > consumers? > > > > > > any idea? > > > > > > As other times, thanks in advance for your help. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > > 389 users mailing list > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20100309/750ed32d/attachment.html
