These are the messages when enabling replication logs: [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Replica in use locking_purl=conn=207283 id=3 [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11 replica="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Unable to acquire replica: error: replica busy locked by conn=207283 id=3 for incremental update [08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest: response=1 rc=0 [08/Mar/2010:16:02:54 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=13 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Begin incremental protocol These are all the messages in the access.log referring the connection conn=207283 [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 fd=607 slot=607 SSL connection from XXXXXX to XXXXXX [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 SSL 256-bit AES [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 BIND dn="cn=Replication Manager,cn=config" method=128 version=3 [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 dn="cn=replication manager,cn=config" [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension" [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 SRCH base="" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension" [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 EXT oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.3" name="Netscape Replication Start Session" [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=120 nentries=0 etime=0 [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e4060000+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX" And no more... As you can see, the replica is busy since 8:16 (now is 16:51, in Spain). I am locked :S. El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:44, Juan Asensio S?nchez <okelet at gmail.com>escribi?: > At first sight, there are no messages neither in access or error logs, in > supplier or consumers. Last modification operation in the busy > replica/database is: > > [08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL > dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e4060000+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX,dc=XXX" > > which does not get any RESULT operation. I have just enabled replication > logs in the consumer to see any messages. As soon i get them, i will post. > > Regards. > > > 2010/3/8 Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> > > Juan Asensio S?nchez wrote: >> > Hi all >> > >> > I have posted this on the chat, but i am not sure if it is wirking >> > fine in my computer. I am using 389ds 1.2.5, and i have found some >> > replication conflicts (nsds5replicaconflict=*). I have deleted them >> > manually, and now the databases in the other servers are busy all the >> > time, no matter if i restart the service in the source or target >> > servers (i must kill the target servers as they never stop), when the >> > replication agreement is launched again from the source server, the >> > replica is busy all the time. the last operation in the access log of >> > the replicated servers is the deletion of the object in conflict, >> > which never gets a result. >> Any thing in the errors log of the suppliers or the consumers? >> > >> > any idea? >> > >> > As other times, thanks in advance for your help. >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> > -- >> > 389 users mailing list >> > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org >> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >> >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20100308/2229e236/attachment.html