Sean Carolan wrote: >> Which yum repo? Note that all of the new 389 packages are in EPEL now - >> see http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes >> > > I didn't change the yum repo from when I first installed fedora-ds. I > mistakenly assumed that the developers would not move the repo around > once they set it up. Sorry about that. Anyone know how I can set up a redirect from the old repo to epel? > I have removed all the packages, set up the new > repo, and used yum to reinstall them all. > > >> 389-admin-1.1.10 fixes a problem with SELinux support (quite possibly >> the one you had to turn off SELinux to get around). >> > > Ok, that's fine, I have disabled SElinux as it's generally more > trouble than it's worth IMHO. Too many little gotchas with various > software packages. At least I will leave it off until I can get the > directory server somewhat functional. > Ok. > >> Does 389-console -D 9 produce any output whatsoever???? >> > > Yes, this time it produced some output. There seems to be something > preventing all the GUI text from rendering correctly. > > http://carolan.ws/console.log > Hmm - nothing there to indicate a problem with the GUI. Is that it? Is this really the last line? ResourceSet: found in cache loader9690857:com.netscape.management.client.util.default Usually these sorts of problems are related to Java, X windows/fonts, running the console remotely via ssh or vnc, etc. but there's nothing here to suggest that. > I downloaded the windows version of the management console and it > seems to be working now! You installed the .msi file on Linux????? > Kind of a hacky solution but that's how > Linux users roll eh? What exactly did you do? > I'll play with this some more and see if I can > get some other servers using it for authentication now. > > thanks for all your help. > > Sean > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >
