Ankur Agarwal wrote: > No i am not talking about proxy server but a master-slave set-up of > OpenLDAP 2.3 and need to achieve chaining between them. > OpenLDAP 2.3 master and OpenLDAP 2.3 slave? If so, then you should ask on one of the openldap lists. > > Cheers, > Ankur > > > --- On *Mon, 10/19/09, Rich Megginson /<rmeggins at redhat.com>/* wrote: > > > From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> > Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write > To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server > project." <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > Date: Monday, October 19, 2009, 1:04 PM > > Ankur Agarwal wrote: > > I want to achieve chaining between a master and slave having > exactly same OUs and are based on OpenLDAP 2.3. > > > > What would be the configuration to achieve that? > > > So 389 is the proxy server and openldap is hosting the real data? It > should just work. Have you tried this configuration? If so, what > problems did you encounter? > > Regards, > > Ankur > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=rmeggins at redhat.com>> > wrote: > > > > Ankur Agarwal wrote: > > Thanks Rich...Would it be possible for you to share some > configuration details to achieve this for OpenLDAP version 2.3? > > > > To achieve what exactly for OpenLDAP 2.3? Chain from 389 to > OpenLDAP? > > > > Cheers, > > A > > > > --- On *Mon, 10/12/09, Rich Megginson /<rmeggins at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=rmeggins at redhat.com>>/* > wrote: > > > > > > From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=rmeggins at redhat.com>> > > Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write > > To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server > > project." <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>> > > Date: Monday, October 12, 2009, 10:47 AM > > > > Ankur Agarwal wrote: > > > Can i use chaining between master-slave without having > different > > "ou"? > > > I mean if i have exactly same directory structure and same set > > of OUs > > > can i still have chaining between master and slave? > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Ankur > > > > > > > > > --- On *Thu, 10/8/09, Michael Str?der > /<michael at stroeder.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=michael at stroeder.com> > > > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=michael at stroeder.com>>/* > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > From: Michael Str?der <michael at stroeder.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=michael at stroeder.com> > > > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=michael at stroeder.com>> > > > Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write > > > To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server > > > project." <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > > > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>> > > > Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 1:38 AM > > > > > > Ankur Agarwal wrote: > > > > > > > > I have a master-slave set-up with write operations always > > being > > > done to > > > > the master node. Now there is an issue where i need to > > read some > > > data > > > > immediately after write, and my read request goes to the > > slave. > > > It fails > > > > in cases when replication hasnt happened from master to > > slave before > > > > this read operation. > > > > > > You simply should not do that. Read from the master if you > > have to > > > rely on the > > > consistency of what you recently wrote to the master. > > > > > > > Is there a LDAP level configuration to handle this > situation? > > > > Can chaining help in this case? > > > > > > No. (Except chaining the read requests of the writing > client to > > > the master > > > which you don't want I guess). > > > > > > Ciao, Michael. > > > > > > -- > > > 389 users mailing list > > > 389-users at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > > > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > > > > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > > 389 users mailing list > > > 389-users at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > > > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > > > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091020/25c525ea/attachment.bin
