No i am not talking about proxy server but a master-slave set-up of OpenLDAP 2.3 and need to achieve chaining between them. ? Cheers, Ankur --- On Mon, 10/19/09, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> Date: Monday, October 19, 2009, 1:04 PM Ankur Agarwal wrote: > I want to achieve chaining between a master and slave having exactly same OUs and are based on OpenLDAP 2.3. > > What would be the configuration to achieve that? >??? So 389 is the proxy server and openldap is hosting the real data?? It should just work.? Have you tried this configuration?? If so, what problems did you encounter? > Regards, > Ankur > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: > > Ankur Agarwal wrote: > Thanks Rich...Would it be possible for you to share some configuration details to achieve this for OpenLDAP version 2.3? > > To achieve what exactly for OpenLDAP 2.3?? Chain from 389 to OpenLDAP? > > Cheers, > A > > --- On *Mon, 10/12/09, Rich Megginson /<rmeggins at redhat.com>/* wrote: > > >? ? From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> >? ? Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write >? ? To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server >? ? project." <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> >? ? Date: Monday, October 12, 2009, 10:47 AM > >? ? Ankur Agarwal wrote: >? ? > Can i use chaining between master-slave without having different >? ? "ou"? >? ? > I mean if i have exactly same directory structure and same set >? ? of OUs >? ? > can i still have chaining between master and slave? >? ? > >? ? Yes. >? ? > >? ? > Cheers, >? ? > Ankur >? ? > >? ? > >? ? > --- On *Thu, 10/8/09, Michael Str?der /<michael at stroeder.com >? ? <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=michael at stroeder.com>>/* >? ? wrote: >? ? > >? ? > >? ? >? ???From: Michael Str?der <michael at stroeder.com >? ? <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=michael at stroeder.com>> >? ? >? ???Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write >? ? >? ???To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server >? ? >? ???project." <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >? ? <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=fedora-directory-users at redhat.com>> >? ? >? ???Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 1:38 AM >? ? > >? ? >? ???Ankur Agarwal wrote: >? ? >? ???> >? ? >? ???> I have a master-slave set-up with write operations always >? ? being >? ? >? ???done to >? ? >? ???> the master node. Now there is an issue where i need to >? ? read some >? ? >? ???data >? ? >? ???> immediately after write, and my read request goes to the >? ? slave. >? ? >? ???It fails >? ? >? ???> in cases when replication hasnt happened from master to >? ? slave before >? ? >? ???> this read operation. >? ? > >? ? >? ???You simply should not do that. Read from the master if you >? ? have to >? ? >? ???rely on the >? ? >? ???consistency of what you recently wrote to the master. >? ? > >? ? >? ???> Is there a LDAP level configuration to handle this situation? >? ? >? ???> Can chaining help in this case? >? ? > >? ? >? ???No. (Except chaining the read requests of the writing client to >? ? >? ???the master >? ? >? ???which you don't want I guess). >? ? > >? ? >? ???Ciao, Michael. >? ? > >? ? >? ???-- >? ? >? ???389 users mailing list >? ? >? ???389-users at redhat.com >? ? <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> >? ? >? ? ? ? <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> >? ? >? ???https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >? ? > >? ? > >? ? > >? ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >? ? > >? ? > -- >? ? > 389 users mailing list >? ? > 389-users at redhat.com >? ? <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> >? ? > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >? ? >??? > > >? ? -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > >? ? -- >? ? 389 users mailing list >? ? 389-users at redhat.com >? ? <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> >? ? https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >? > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > >? ? ??? > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >??? -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- 389 users mailing list 389-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091020/7a2c32d7/attachment.html
