Mikael Kermorgant wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: > > >>>>> First ones were the day after a schema modification on the master >>>>> which had not been weel propagated on the slaves. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> How did you modify the schema on the master? >>>> >>>> >>> Via the console, by adding an attribute. >>> Had to copy the schema files to the slaves later. >>> >>> >> Were there any messages in the errors logs on the supplier or consumers >> about not being able to replicate the schema? >> > > Yep, there were some : > > [23/Sep/2009:10:59:58 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - > agmtlist_add_callback: Can't start agreement "cn=supann0& - > bsupann01,cn=replica,cn="dc=dede, dc=deded, dc=fr",cn=mapping > tree,cn=config" > That's really odd. Do you get that at startup? That indicates some sort of configuration problem. You could try starting the server with /usr/lib/dirsrv/slapd-instance/start-slapd -d 8192 to see if there is more detailed information. > And many of these : > > [23/Sep/2009:14:37:13 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - > agmt="cn=bsupann01" (192:389): Replica has a different generation ID > than the local data. > [23/Sep/2009:14:37:17 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - > agmt="cn=bsupann01" (192:389): Replica has a different generation ID > than the local data. > This usually means the consumer has not been initialized. > > However, I now really want to migrate to some safer virtualisation > environment. Maybe a bit over pessimistic but I'm affraid of the FC11 > domU on centos dom0... > > > Regards, > > Mikael > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091005/dcee8389/attachment.bin
