Hello, On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> First ones were the day after a schema modification on the master >>>> which had not been weel propagated on the slaves. >>>> >>> >>> How did you modify the schema on the master? >>> >> >> Via the console, by adding an attribute. >> Had to copy the schema files to the slaves later. >> > > Were there any messages in the errors logs on the supplier or consumers > about not being able to replicate the schema? Yep, there were some : [23/Sep/2009:10:59:58 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmtlist_add_callback: Can't start agreement "cn=supann0& - bsupann01,cn=replica,cn="dc=dede, dc=deded, dc=fr",cn=mapping tree,cn=config" And many of these : [23/Sep/2009:14:37:13 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=bsupann01" (192:389): Replica has a different generation ID than the local data. [23/Sep/2009:14:37:17 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=bsupann01" (192:389): Replica has a different generation ID than the local data. However, I now really want to migrate to some safer virtualisation environment. Maybe a bit over pessimistic but I'm affraid of the FC11 domU on centos dom0... Regards, Mikael
