Daniel wrote: > And what kind of action do you recommend? > Let's first identify what version of fedora-ds - rpm -qi fedora-ds-base > Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Daniel wrote: >> >>> Hi Rich, >>> >>> very good point, I just discovered a very important difference. >>> >>> ldap1 - rpm -qi 389-ds-base gives - package "389-ds-base is not >>> installed" - >>> >> rpm -qi fedora-ds-base >> >>> unlike of ldap2 which states the following output: >>> >>> Name : 389-ds-base Relocations: (not >>> relocatable) >>> Version : 1.2.2 Vendor: (none) >>> Release : 1.el5 Build Date: Tue 25 Aug >>> 2009 10:55:38 PM CEST >>> Install Date: Sat 07 Nov 2009 09:33:41 PM CET Build Host: localhost >>> Group : System Environment/Daemons Source RPM: >>> 389-ds-base-1.2.2-1.el5.src.rpm >>> Size : 5236534 License: GPLv2 with >>> exceptions >>> Signature : DSA/SHA1, Wed 26 Aug 2009 04:15:41 PM CEST, Key ID >>> 0db66119a7b02652 >>> URL : http://port389.org/ >>> Summary : 389 Directory Server (base) >>> Description : >>> 389 Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant server. The base package >>> includes >>> the LDAP server and command line utilities for server administration. >>> >>> ldap1 is the machine I have taken after someone and I was told that >>> it's the 389 dirserver. >>> >>> When I want an information about package installed on ldap1 I have to >>> write: >>> >>> rpm -qi fedora-ds >>> >>> with this output: >>> >>> Name : fedora-ds Relocations: (not >>> relocatable) >>> Version : 1.1.3 Vendor: (none) >>> Release : 1.fc6 Build Date: Wed 01 Apr >>> 2009 09:15:05 PM CEST >>> Install Date: Sat 11 Apr 2009 11:01:52 PM CEST Build Host: >>> localhost >>> Group : System Environment/Daemons Source RPM: >>> fedora-ds-1.1.3-1.fc6.src.rpm >>> Size : 12279 License: GPLv2 >>> Signature : DSA/SHA1, Thu 02 Apr 2009 08:57:18 PM CEST, Key ID >>> 0db66119a7b02652 >>> URL : http://directory.fedoraproject.org/ >>> Summary : Red Hat Directory, Administration, and Console Suite >>> Description : >>> The Red Hat Directory Server, Administration Server, and Console >>> Suite provide >>> the LDAPv3 server, the httpd daemon used to administer the server, >>> and the >>> console GUI application used for server and user/group administration. >>> >>> Do you think this could be the part of the reason? >>> >> I think the problem is schema/syntax incompatibility between fedora ds >> and the latest 389 ds. I'd like to try to narrow down exactly what >> schema/syntax is causing the problem. >> >>> Rich Megginson wrote: >>> >>>> Daniel wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, I need a helping hand from some experienced 389-ds admin. >>>>> >>>>> I have built two LDAPs based on CentOS 5.3 and Fedora directory >>>>> server. >>>>> >>>>> ldap1 - is the production server which is running a few months. all of >>>>> the data are placed there. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> What version? rpm -qi 389-ds-base (or fedora-ds-base if still using >>>> fedora-ds) >>>> >>>>> ldap2 - is the clean install of CentOS 5.3 and 389-ds, identical to >>>>> ldap1, but with no data at all. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> What version? rpm -qi 389-ds-base >>>> >>>> The schema and syntax checking have been improved in 389 1.2.1 and >>>> later. Do you have any custom schema? >>>> >>>>> My point is to replicate present ldap1 data in to the new ldap2 >>>>> server. >>>>> >>>>> I went through the documentation here >>>>> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:MultiMasterReplication >>>>> and >>>>> everything seems to be OK >>>>> Replication agreements are created, when I display them I get the >>>>> following output >>>>> >>>>> replication agreements from ldap1.mydomain.com (389) >>>>> ->ldap2.mydomain.com (389) >>>>> >>>>> replication agreements from ldap2.mydomain.com (389) >>>>> ->ldap1.mydomaincom (389) >>>>> >>>>> ...but when I perform the ldapsearch for some certain records - ldap2 >>>>> won't find anything. >>>>> >>>>> So I checked the ldap1 error log and found this >>>>> >>>>> 25/Nov/2009:13:08:40 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt_delete: begin >>>>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:48 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - >>>>> agmt="cn="Replication to ldap2.mydomain.com"" (ldap2:389): Schema >>>>> replication update failed: Invalidsyntax >>>>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:48 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - >>>>> agmt="cn="Replication to ldap2.mydomain.com"" (ldap2:389): Warning: >>>>> unable to replicate schema: rc=1 >>>>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - >>>>> agmt="cn="Replication to ldap2.mydomain.com"" (ldap2:389): Schema >>>>> replication update failed: Invalid syntax >>>>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Warning: >>>>> unable to >>>>> replicate schema to host ldap2.mydomain.com, port 389. Continuing with >>>>> total update session. >>>>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Beginning total >>>>> update of replica "agmt="cn="Replication to ldap2.mydomain.com"" >>>>> (ldap2:389)". >>>>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:54 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Finished total >>>>> update of replica "agmt="cn="Replication to ldap2.mydomain.com"" >>>>> (ldap2:389)". Sent 107 entries. >>>>> >>>>> Can you please explain to me what does it mean "Invalid syntax"? >>>>> I googled but no useful information were found. >>>>> >>>>> So if someone knows what to do for solution I would greatly appreciate >>>>> the help. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you very much. >>>>> >>>>> ~ Daniel. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> 389 users mailing list >>>>> 389-users at redhat.com >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 389 users mailing list >>>> 389-users at redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> -- >>> 389 users mailing list >>> 389-users at redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091130/728f7866/attachment.bin
