Daniel wrote: > Hi Rich, > > very good point, I just discovered a very important difference. > > ldap1 - rpm -qi 389-ds-base gives - package "389-ds-base is not > installed" - rpm -qi fedora-ds-base > > unlike of ldap2 which states the following output: > > Name : 389-ds-base Relocations: (not relocatable) > Version : 1.2.2 Vendor: (none) > Release : 1.el5 Build Date: Tue 25 Aug > 2009 10:55:38 PM CEST > Install Date: Sat 07 Nov 2009 09:33:41 PM CET Build Host: localhost > Group : System Environment/Daemons Source RPM: > 389-ds-base-1.2.2-1.el5.src.rpm > Size : 5236534 License: GPLv2 with > exceptions > Signature : DSA/SHA1, Wed 26 Aug 2009 04:15:41 PM CEST, Key ID > 0db66119a7b02652 > URL : http://port389.org/ > Summary : 389 Directory Server (base) > Description : > 389 Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant server. The base package > includes > the LDAP server and command line utilities for server administration. > > ldap1 is the machine I have taken after someone and I was told that > it's the 389 dirserver. > > When I want an information about package installed on ldap1 I have to > write: > > rpm -qi fedora-ds > > with this output: > > Name : fedora-ds Relocations: (not relocatable) > Version : 1.1.3 Vendor: (none) > Release : 1.fc6 Build Date: Wed 01 Apr > 2009 09:15:05 PM CEST > Install Date: Sat 11 Apr 2009 11:01:52 PM CEST Build Host: localhost > Group : System Environment/Daemons Source RPM: > fedora-ds-1.1.3-1.fc6.src.rpm > Size : 12279 License: GPLv2 > Signature : DSA/SHA1, Thu 02 Apr 2009 08:57:18 PM CEST, Key ID > 0db66119a7b02652 > URL : http://directory.fedoraproject.org/ > Summary : Red Hat Directory, Administration, and Console Suite > Description : > The Red Hat Directory Server, Administration Server, and Console Suite > provide > the LDAPv3 server, the httpd daemon used to administer the server, and the > console GUI application used for server and user/group administration. > > Do you think this could be the part of the reason? I think the problem is schema/syntax incompatibility between fedora ds and the latest 389 ds. I'd like to try to narrow down exactly what schema/syntax is causing the problem. > > Rich Megginson wrote: >> Daniel wrote: >>> Hi, I need a helping hand from some experienced 389-ds admin. >>> >>> I have built two LDAPs based on CentOS 5.3 and Fedora directory server. >>> >>> ldap1 - is the production server which is running a few months. all of >>> the data are placed there. >>> >> What version? rpm -qi 389-ds-base (or fedora-ds-base if still using >> fedora-ds) >>> ldap2 - is the clean install of CentOS 5.3 and 389-ds, identical to >>> ldap1, but with no data at all. >>> >> What version? rpm -qi 389-ds-base >> >> The schema and syntax checking have been improved in 389 1.2.1 and >> later. Do you have any custom schema? >>> My point is to replicate present ldap1 data in to the new ldap2 server. >>> >>> I went through the documentation here >>> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:MultiMasterReplication >>> and >>> everything seems to be OK >>> Replication agreements are created, when I display them I get the >>> following output >>> >>> replication agreements from ldap1.mydomain.com (389) >>> ->ldap2.mydomain.com (389) >>> >>> replication agreements from ldap2.mydomain.com (389) >>> ->ldap1.mydomaincom (389) >>> >>> ...but when I perform the ldapsearch for some certain records - ldap2 >>> won't find anything. >>> >>> So I checked the ldap1 error log and found this >>> >>> 25/Nov/2009:13:08:40 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt_delete: begin >>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:48 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - >>> agmt="cn="Replication to ldap2.mydomain.com"" (ldap2:389): Schema >>> replication update failed: Invalidsyntax >>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:48 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - >>> agmt="cn="Replication to ldap2.mydomain.com"" (ldap2:389): Warning: >>> unable to replicate schema: rc=1 >>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - >>> agmt="cn="Replication to ldap2.mydomain.com"" (ldap2:389): Schema >>> replication update failed: Invalid syntax >>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Warning: unable to >>> replicate schema to host ldap2.mydomain.com, port 389. Continuing with >>> total update session. >>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Beginning total >>> update of replica "agmt="cn="Replication to ldap2.mydomain.com"" >>> (ldap2:389)". >>> [25/Nov/2009:13:08:54 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Finished total >>> update of replica "agmt="cn="Replication to ldap2.mydomain.com"" >>> (ldap2:389)". Sent 107 entries. >>> >>> Can you please explain to me what does it mean "Invalid syntax"? >>> I googled but no useful information were found. >>> >>> So if someone knows what to do for solution I would greatly appreciate >>> the help. >>> >>> Thank you very much. >>> >>> ~ Daniel. >>> >>> -- >>> 389 users mailing list >>> 389-users at redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091125/b0911590/attachment.bin
