Rich Megginson wrote: > Andrey Ivanov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> There may be several attributes of interest to you as far as the >> memory consumption is concerned >> (http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/cli/Configuration_Command_File_Reference-Plug_in_Implemented_Server_Functionality_Reference-Database_Plug_in_Attributes.html) >> : >> nsslapd-dbcachesize >> nsslapd-cachememsize for every backend (by default, your data is in >> cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config) >> nsslapd-import-cachesize (used only during ldif import) > Start with nsslapd-cachememsize - make that as large as possible and > minimize nsslapd-dbcachesize >> >> You can adjust the corresponding values by monitoring the attributes >> like currententrycachesize or entrycachehitratio of >> cn=monitor,cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config >> (http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/cli/Configuration_Command_File_Reference-Plug_in_Implemented_Server_Functionality_Reference-Database_Plug_in_Attributes.html#Configuration_Command_File_Reference-Database_Plug_in_Attributes-Database_Attributes_under_cnmonitor_cnldbm_database_cnplugins_cnconfig) >> >> > You can also use the logconv.pl script to examine the access log to > see what types of searches are being done and which are not indexed > properly. > So after playing with logconv a bit, it looked like finger was making this call in the logs... [26/Jun/2009:10:59:36 -0400] conn=283289 op=-1 fd=80 closed - B1 [26/Jun/2009:10:59:36 -0400] conn=283289 op=2 RESULT err=11 tag=101 nentries=0 etime=1 notes=U [26/Jun/2009:10:59:35 -0400] conn=283289 op=2 SRCH base="ou=really,ou=long,o=name,dc=school,dc=edu" scope=2 filter="(objectClass=posixAccount)" attrs="uid userPassword uidNumber gidNumber cn homeDirectory loginShell gecos description objectClass" [26/Jun/2009:10:59:35 -0400] conn=283289 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [26/Jun/2009:10:59:35 -0400] conn=283289 op=1 SRCH base="ou=systems,ou=services,o=hascs,dc=fas,dc=harvard,dc=edu" scope=2 filter="(&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=foo))" attrs="uid userPassword uidNumber gidNumber cn homeDirectory loginShell gecos description objectClass" [26/Jun/2009:10:59:35 -0400] conn=283289 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 dn="" [26/Jun/2009:10:59:35 -0400] conn=283289 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128 version=3 [26/Jun/2009:10:59:35 -0400] conn=283289 fd=80 slot=80 connection from 1.2.3.4 to 4.3.2.1 But even after indexing "uid userPassword uidNumber gidNumber cn homeDirectory loginShell gecos description objectClass" finger still responds slower then it does on comparison to the older openLDAP servers... where we don't do indexing on all of these attributes, AND still claims that I'm running an search that hasn't been indexed! I'm I missing something glaringly obvious? Thanks! Tim
