Hi, There may be several attributes of interest to you as far as the memory consumption is concerned ( http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/cli/Configuration_Command_File_Reference-Plug_in_Implemented_Server_Functionality_Reference-Database_Plug_in_Attributes.html) : nsslapd-dbcachesize nsslapd-cachememsize for every backend (by default, your data is in cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config) nsslapd-import-cachesize (used only during ldif import) You can adjust the corresponding values by monitoring the attributes like currententrycachesize or entrycachehitratio of cn=monitor,cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config ( http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/cli/Configuration_Command_File_Reference-Plug_in_Implemented_Server_Functionality_Reference-Database_Plug_in_Attributes.html#Configuration_Command_File_Reference-Database_Plug_in_Attributes-Database_Attributes_under_cnmonitor_cnldbm_database_cnplugins_cnconfig ) 2009/6/26 Tim Hartmann <hartmann at fas.harvard.edu> > Hi! > > > I was spending some time today trying to make sure that I was getting the > most bang for my buck today an my replica's and I notices two items of > interest that I was wondering if anyone else had input on! > > Firstly, after creating a number of indexs, my performance seems to be > really good, the exception that I noticed was "finger" I noticed that finger > takes a couple of seconds to return the data on RHDS whereas on OpenLDAP, it > pops right now in real time! My first though was that I was doing an > un-indexed search, but I can't for the life of me figure out what I might > not be indexing that I should be! > > The second thing I noticed was that on my servers, which are RHEL5, running > 32bit OS's with the PAE Kernels, RHDS doesn't ever actually address more > then 3 gig of ram! I was looking through the documentations, and it looks > like by raising the "Maximum Cache Size" I'll be able to allow RHDS to use > more of the available memory.. did I get that right? > > > Anyway, as always thanks in advance for all the help! This list has been a > tremendous resource for an application that keeps on showing it's value in > huge ways! > > > Best, > > Tim > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20090626/ee47f252/attachment.html
