Michael Str?der wrote: > Tim Hartmann wrote: > >> - The plug in won't work for the RDN names we have in memberUid, (we >> actually have both the RDN and DN listed as values under the memberUid >> attribute, i was hoping it would see the DN, but it didn't) >> > > memberUID is not meant to hold a DN (see RFC 2307). It's for storing the > value of attribute 'uid' of a member entry. If you store DNs therein be > prepared for interop issues with pam_ldap / nss_ldap. > > Ciao, Michael. > > Thanks Michael! Thats good info! I've inherited the directory, so it may be worthing going through and cleaning out the cob webs! Tim
