Re: Referential Integrity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry I can't be more help but I am listening! We use referential
integrity but have not yet implemented it in multi-master mode nor have
we really stressed and tested it - John

On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 11:39 -0500, Tim Hartmann wrote:
> I folks,
> 
> Did anyone have any thoughts on this? If not, I think I'll just enable
> it and start testing....  :) 
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> Tim Hartmann wrote:
> > So After my trials and tribulations with " Referrals for Update
> > Operations"  (thanks again, you guys rock!) hence  known as "Tim's
> > continuing  LDAP Saga and Viking Cha-Cha"
> >
> > I came across "Referential Integrity" in the docs, and boy howdy does it
> > look useful!
> > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/ag/8.0/Creating_Directory_Entries-Maintaining_Referential_Integrity.html
> >
> > I had a couple of concerns, before I enabled it that I was hoping people
> > could chime in on!
> >
> >
> > 1) I'd like to have Referential Integrity monitor the memberUid field as
> > well, but I was unclear in the documentation if when scanning the
> > directory if it scans ALL the directories hosted by a given server, or
> > just searches in the directory where the user was deleted?
> >
> > for example, I have two root suffixes,  both of which contain  users and
> > groups ,  and more often then we'd like user "foo" exists in both...
> >
> > dc=example,dc=edu
> >
> > dc=dept,dc=example,dc=edu
> >
> > if I delete user uid=foo,ou=People,dc=dept,dc=example,dc=edu
> >
> > would the Referential Integrity plug in know to leave  any instance of 
> > "uid=foo" and "memberUid=foo" in the dc=example,dc=edu branch alone?
> >
> >
> > 2) I have 2 Masters (set up to be Multi Masters) and 4 Replica's,  There
> > are a number of warnings about setting this up only on 1 of the Masters
> > (which shouldn't be a problem), in the case that M1 is configured with
> > the Referential Integrity plug in, and it goes down for some amount of
> > time, and a user is deleted, will the plugin "Catch up" once M1 has been
> > brought back online?
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the input!
> >
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
-- 
John A. Sullivan III
Open Source Development Corporation
+1 207-985-7880
jsullivan at opensourcedevel.com

http://www.spiritualoutreach.com
Making Christianity intelligible to secular society




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux