Vipul Ramani wrote: > > already enabled 8192 log-level !!! ... > > And what does it mean 640-bit does not supported - does mean FDS > community wont be able to support or PassSyn not work at all !!! Can > you please explain ... That means we don't have a 64-bit Windows development environment with which to develop and test 64-bit winsync. AFAIK, the code is 64-bit clean - it just needs to be built and tested. > > do u know any other piece of code which will replace PassSync and i > can come out of this 64-bit limitation ??? No, not that I know of. > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Vipul Ramani <vipulramani at gmail.com > <mailto:vipulramani at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Yes i am using simple authentication . NOT SSL based client auth .. > > Any plans for PassSyn Support for 64 - bit OS ??? > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards > > Vipul Ramani > > > > > -- > Regards > > Vipul Ramani > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20081020/5665df4c/attachment.bin
