David Boreham wrote: > > Memory is hazy about this, but I seem to remember that it was done as > two steps because AD didn't allow userAccountControl to be set in the > ADD. It had to be set by a separate MOD. Perhaps AD has changed since > that time in this respect though. No, I broke this in 1.1.3 - it was working fine in 1.1.2. > > Rich Megginson wrote: >> Howard Chu wrote: >>>> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:13:08 -0700 >>>> From: Rich Megginson<rmeggins at redhat.com> >>> >>>> John Dickinson wrote: >>>>> On 30 Oct 2008, at 16:00, Rich Megginson<rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> create user in AD userAccountControl: 512 (Normal) >>>>> create user in Fedora DS (console) userAccountControl: 546 >>>>> (Normal + >>>>> PASSWD_NOTREQ + ACCOUNTDISABLE) >>>>> >>>>> Would there be anything wrong with Fedora DS just forcing >>>>> userAccountControl = 512? Or are more options needed in the user >>>>> creation dialog? >>>> I'm not sure. 1.1.3 included a "fix" for userAccountControl. The way >>>> it works now is this: >>>> add new AD entry over LDAP - no userAccountControl attribute is >>>> present, >>>> so it must use some sort of AD default value >>>> read the new AD entry - get the userAccountControl value >>>> set AD entry userAccountControl |= 0x200 # 512 == normal account) >>>> >>>> So you might try a simple test - add a new AD entry over LDAP >>>> outside of >>>> windows sync - see what the default userAccountControl value is - I'm >>>> guessing that adding a new AD entry without specifying >>>> userAccountControl sets it to PASSWD_NOTREQ + ACCOUNTDISABLE >>> >>> Yes, users created via LDAP are disabled unless you explicitly >>> provide the userAccountControl attribute (with proper flags) in the >>> LDAP Add operation. I tripped over this myself the first time I >>> loaded up a test database in AD. (It also gave me a Fine Opportunity >>> to time how long it took to LDAP Modify all of the users in my test >>> database. ugh...) >>> >> Then this is a bug in the winsync code. In the ADD case, it should >> just force userAccountControl to the Normal value. In the MOD case, >> it should |= the value. John, can you open a bug about this issue? >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
