The packaging of Fedora DS 1.1 has a pretty significant change after Fedora DS 1.0.4 and also we haven't run into any stability problem with Fedora DS 1.0.2 so to minimize risk it would be better to stay at the Fedora DS 1.0.2. Do you think I'll run into any problem running Fedora DS 1.0.2 build against Fedora Core 5 on RHEL 5.1? Thanks! David On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:29 PM, solarflow99 <solarflow99 at gmail.com> wrote: > is there a reason why you can't use 1.1? I have it installed on rhel 5.1and it works well. > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Chun Tat David Chu < > beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I would like to install Fedora DS 1.0.2 LDAP (64 bits) on RHEL 5.1 (64 > > bits) using the binary package (fedora-ds-1.0.2-1.FC5.x86_64.opt.rpm) > > built against the FC5 that can be downloaded from the Fedora DS website ( > > http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Download). > > > > I installed it, launched the console and ran couple of my Java LDAP > > tests that use Java Native Directory Interface (JNDI), and it seems to be > > working happily. > > > > When I look at it, it seems like it is compatible. > > > > I would like to know if I miss anything obvious that the Fedora DS 1.0.2binary package that built against FC5 will not be compatible with RHEL > > 5.1? > > > > Thanks!! > > > > - David > > > > -- > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080331/6e40a26e/attachment.html
