After I've had a chance to work with this further I don't recommend anyone reregister any 1.1 servers with a 1.0.x configuration directory. While the installation of a new server will not fail, attempting to access the new server from the old console does not work. I'm still messing around, but I think I will have to move down the same path as David and have each replicated node registered with itself. Luke Bigum wrote: > Thanks for everyone's reply. David, I too had the same issue, even > problems registering with another 1.1 instance. A bit of digging and > Googling led me to this Red Hat Bug that has solved my registration > problem, it might fix yours: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431103 > > The problem seems to be the setup script tries to create objects a few > levels down without first creating parent objects. The workaround is to > create the entries by hand using the template LDIF provided. For an LDIF > file, don't forget to add "changetype: add" after the distinguished name > line, then: > > ldapmodify -a -f ~/ldif.txt -x -H ldap://hydra.its.deakin.edu.au:389/ -D > "uid=admin,ou=Administrators,ou=TopologyManagement,o=NetscapeRoot" -w > 'xxxxxx' > > David Bogen wrote: >> On Mar 19, 2008, at 9:46 PM, Luke Bigum wrote: >> >>> >>> I'm looking to upgrade some Fedora DS 1.02 servers to 1.1. We use a >>> master-slave replicated configuration. Before I get too far into it, >>> are there any known compatibility issues between 1.1 and 1.02? I was >>> planning on updating one of the slaves to 1.1 first, leaving our >>> master 1.02 server as it is for the time being. Is this possible or >>> would I have to upgrade the master first? >>> >> >> We took a few steps down that same road and were less than pleased >> with the results. Our configuration directory is still running 1.0.2 >> and a 1.1 slave was unable to register with it despite repeated >> attempts and some poking around inside the configuration directory. >> >> So, we ended up with that slave running without being registered with >> the configuration directory. >> >> From where I sit, it looks like an all-or-nothing affair to upgrade >> to 1.1. >> >> David >> >> -- >> David Bogen :: (608) 263-0168 >> Unix SysAdmin :: IceCube Project >> david.bogen at icecube.wisc.edu >> >> >> >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -- Luke Bigum, Unix Administrator, Information Technology Services Division Deakin University, Waterfront Campus, Victoria 3217 Australia. Phone: 03 5227 8691 International: +61 3 5227 8691 Fax: 03 5227 8866 International: +61 3 5227 8866 E-mail: luke.bigum at deakin.edu.au Website: http://www.deakin.edu.au Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code: 00113B (Vic), 02414F (NSW) Important Notice: The contents of this email transmission, including any attachments, are intended solely for the named addressee and are confidential; any unauthorized use, reproduction or storage of the contents and any attachments is expressly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please delete it and any attachments from your system immediately and advise the sender by return email or telephone. Deakin University does not warrant that this email and any attachments are error or virus free.
